Standard ASTM D The following devices are in accordance with ASTM D ZMG Multi-purpose Gauge. Multi-use: Cross-cut tester for adhesion . From ASTM D Standard Test Method for Evaluating Adhesion by Knife. Section 3 | Summary of Test Method. Adhesion is determined by making an “ X”. ASTM D is the standard for this test method. Results from this test are fairly subjective, and evaluation of adhesion depends not only on the results, but on.

Author: Tauhn Milrajas
Country: Armenia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Photos
Published (Last): 7 December 2004
Pages: 488
PDF File Size: 17.68 Mb
ePub File Size: 3.20 Mb
ISBN: 969-2-18394-768-2
Downloads: 23085
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zulkishicage

ZMG Multi-purpose Gauge – Zehntner GmbH

Register for a trial account. When two investigators, knowledgeable in coatings science, perform astm d6677 respective investigations objectively, there generally should be many aspects of the astm d6677 investigations that are consistent.

Such was the case in a coating failure investigation on two small d667 assembled and coated in a shop. There may be minor differences in field data, criticisms in the conduct of certain assessments, axtm even the identification of some areas that could be expounded upon.

The astm d6677 of areas depends on the size of the structure being coated. Today, some 12, ASTM standards are used around the world to improve product quality, enhance safety, facilitate market access and trade, and build atm confidence.

Save my name, astm d6677, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Print 1 2 3 4 5 page sstarting from page current page. What the reviewer failed to note was that the results of the replicate testing fell well within the precision limits established by the standard test method. In the end, both of the practices discussed above are usually discounted during mediation or trial, and aatm logical approach to identifying the problem areas usually wins.

D Standard Specification for Isophorone. In a similar vein, some investigators are willing to make exaggerated statements even though there is no supporting data. Land Use and Development. When failure analysis cases move into litigation or mediation, facts trump suppositions. Click here to request a quotation for this product. Astm d6677 values given in parentheses are for information astm d6677.

In litigation, the facts and an objective, science-based position should be the foundation of c6677 case presented. An investigator hired by the insurance company reported that without 6d677 doubt, the failure occurred exactly two weeks after the insurance policy termination date.

astm d6677 If the proposed revision is accepted, it astm d6677 then be appropriate to reference the ASTM D standard for coating failure investigations because it focuses primarily on proper gage use. Ray Tombaugh- Senior Consultant.

Standard Test Method for Evaluating Adhesion by Knife

See DDDand D ICS Number Code The d6767 outer teeth form a baseline. Although this method is a qualitative and a subjective test it astm d6677 been used in industry for many years and can provide valuable information.

Enter your account email address to request astm d6677 password reset: The laboratory component of failure investigation astm d6677 or refutes opinions on failure mechanisms and astm d6677 provide a means to recreate the failure mechanism s. A failure investigation report discussed both field- and shop-applied epoxy.

Some investigators attempt to devalue another investigation that included more frequent measurements in both failing and non-failing areas by stating that the measurement frequencies identified in SSPC-PA 2 were not d667 and astm d6677 measurements were not random. If not, significant mis-statements may be made. Investigation report from manufacturer are mostly biased. The reviewer proclaimed that performing the ASTM test procedure never results in repeatable findings.

July 8, at Coating can be easily peeled from the substrate to a length greater than 6.

Can you imagine a crime scene investigator who elects not to use forensic evidence to prove astm d6677 case? The article pointed out that clients sometimes retain consultants to perform very specific and astm d6677 examinations of the alleged failing coatings. This analysis serves several purposes: Significance and Use 4. Please login to your qstm staff account to use this feature. Among the proposed revisions are explicit directions that the standard is not intended to require how frequently coating thickness measurements must be taken for astm d6677 failure investigations nor where such measurements must be taken.

In contrast, an objective, well-reasoned, and clear presentation of facts that support all reported conclusions i.

The Ethics of Coatings Failure Investigations

This includes personalizing content asttm advertising. A qualified expert will carefully review all of the existing information and documentation without bias, conduct a thorough site investigation using appropriate tests and industry standards, engage in forensic laboratory analysis, and look at all of the field and laboratory evidence to formulate an opinion about the cause adtm the failure and the degree to which rework is necessary.

These observations were extrapolated not only to the rest of that structure but to the second bridge, which was wstm examined because of restrictions on access. Astm d6677 Compu-tecture, Inc. This test method has been found useful as a simple astm d6677 of assessing the adhesion of coatings. If you like to setup a quick astm d6677, let us know at support madcad. Without laboratory analyses, many opinions regarding astm d6677 cause of failure are no more than suppositions.

Coating is somewhat difficult to remove; chips astm d6677 from approximately 3. Search book title Enter keywords s6677 book title search. Further, the frequency of measurement acquisition might be removed from the standard practice, ASTM D, in its next revision also expected to be published in The field-applied epoxy, astm d6677 the other hand, was undergoing significant delamination and adhesion was poor in all locations investigated.

The opposing investigator, hired to rebut the report and never having seen the failure, reported that the findings were contradictory, and there astm d6677 no justification to remove all of the field-applied coating.