Interlanguage theory is generally credited to Larry Selinker, an American professor of applied linguistics, whose article “Interlanguage”. INTERLANGUAGE. Larry Selinker. Published Online: | DOI: https:// · total citations on Dimensions. Selinker-Interlanguage – Download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online.

Author: Kigagal Voodooll
Country: Thailand
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Environment
Published (Last): 18 October 2017
Pages: 171
PDF File Size: 7.23 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.71 Mb
ISBN: 848-5-63368-654-5
Downloads: 34231
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Musho

Linguistic Systems and Linguistic Change in an Interlanguage.

Interlanguage – Wikipedia

Volume 9 Issue 2 Janpp. This article has multiple issues. State of the selihker This theory assumed that learners’ errors were caused by the difference between their L1 and L2.

Interlanguage and its Manifestations in Translation. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. Communication strategies used in the writing of answers in biology by ESL first year science students of the University of Botswana.

International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching

To employ or not to employ expatriate non-native speaker teachers: Proposals Based on the Aprescrilov Learner Corpus. Preemption and the Learning of L2 Grammars.

Thus, literate learners may produce much more target-like forms in a writing task for which they have 30 minutes to plan, than in conversation where they must produce language with almost no planning at all. Perspectives on relative clauses. Pushed output in a multi-stage dictogloss task: During eelinker time in Michigan he served as a visiting professor at Carnegie Lafry University inand spent his third Fulbright scholarship at the University of Kassel in Germany in The talented language learner: First and Second Language Learning: Whose Model of Competence?

Volume 1 Issue Jahresband Janpp.

Larry Selinker – Wikipedia

The Cognitive Method and Error Analysis. A Study of Relations. Partnership between grammatical construction and interactional frame: When learners experience significant restructuring in their L2 systems, they sometimes show a U-shaped learning pattern.

For example, they may deliberately choose to address a non-target form like “me no” to an English teacher in order to assert identity with a non-mainstream ethnic group. A case study of three Japanese ESL writers. Volume 45 Issue 4 Decpp.

Communication strategies in a multimodal virtual communication context. Vantage points for the analysis of scientific discourse. Robert Lado held that the claims of contrastive analysis should be viewed as hypothetical unless and until they were based on systematic analyses of learner speech data.

Volume 4 Issue Janpp.


The interlanguage rules are claimed to be shaped by several factors, including L1-transfer, previous learning strategies, strategies of L2 acquisition i. A snapshot of thirty-five selinkker of instructed second language acquisition. This approach was deficit-focused, in the sense that speech errors were thought to arise randomly and should be corrected.

The current convergence in linguistic theory: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Volume 10 Issue Janpp. It can occur even in motivated learners who are continuously exposed to their L2 or have adequate learning support.

In these approaches, a learner’s preference for one linguistic variant over another can depend on social contextual variables such as the status or role of the person the learner is speaking to.

Effects of Computational Complexity.